Get custom Essay sample written according to your requirements We will write a custom essay sample on Social Stratification Essay Even though social stratification systems exist in all societies except primitive societies, the standards used to rank people and nature of stratifications systems differ from each society around the world. In a complex society social stratifications structures are present. For example term paper writer service, people can be ranked by gender sample business research reports, race, and ethnicity. Different places use rankings based on economic factors such as social class. Even though a person has money doesn’t not give them prestige, and one may have power because of the money they may have personal essay topics for higher, but still can lack honor. Social stratification is defined as writing essays competitions, “a concept involving the classification of people into groups based on shared economic conditions… a relational set of inequalities with economic best place buy research papers, social, political, and ideological dimensions”. All societies around the world people have different terms for social and biological characteristics like age, gender, and size, ethnic backgrounds etc. when the characteristics are valued differently we tend to start having social inequality and social stratification. We’re ranked and evaluated according to social values, and the results is a hierarchy based degree of prestige, honor, importance, material goods, and other rewards that come from these characteristics. Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter The social structure of India, on the other hand, is dominated by the “closed class”, that is, the caste system. Any careful observer will find two types of class hierarchy in the Indian social scene; the ‘traditional caste hierarchy’ which is articulated in religious terms and the ‘modern hierarchy’ ‘which is emergent. Social Stratification in our society, commenced with the Chatur-varna system. Its origin remains unknown. It, however, gained prominence towards the end of the Rigvedic age. A person could be a Brahman, Kshatriya, Vaish history test essay questions, or Sudra. To be of one or the other order depended on one’s choosing the varna. Apparently professor write my paper, Varna divided the society; but it did not block the chances of social mobility. The caste in contrast is acquired on the basis of birth. The advanced industrial societies of the west are characterised by the “open class” system. As defined earlier in this paper and with reference to Karl Marx, power refers to the ability to pursue goals despite resisting factors. Power will be addressed with reference to size and various natures of societies. The degree of division of labor in the society is related to the way typical social classes will be formed. Power exists in two diverse forms; legitimate and illegitimate and hence there cannot be established a direct relation between power and social stratification. Individuals and families do not live in isolations or islands 'in the society'. Their day to day activities are influenced by norms set by the nature of the community. Families and individuals by extension are given placed under certain social classes due to the way the society operates. The position of the local community in the society is determined by the nature of influence it has on the entire community (Andersen 216-220). Weber was thrilled by the propositions of his predecessor, Marx, and hence he thought of making corrections to Marx's theory. Weber designed a model based on status essay writing on myself one sample, class and a more explicit and systematic differentiation with reference to social stratification. Unlike Marx who identified property to be the sole determining factor in social stratification, Weber identified status and class as additional factors. Weber built an interconnected model that would define the relationship between these three factors. Any one of factors can affect the other two, and in any case any of these factors can be replaced with another. In his model, Weber also did not cover several key influencing factors like education, ethnic and kinship factors. The above theory is said to have emanated from the Judaeo-Christian Bible 'which presents' the social idea of the Greeks. Though the idea was not extremely straightforward at the beginning, it has gone through various transformations to the present day where it presents itself clearly. Every society has various classes that are assumed by members of the society based on various factors. Common held belief in the society model the way a society sets up these classes. Most common factors that determine classification are education and knowledge, power, prestige, and religion among other factors. Sociologists have formed various theories to address the determining factors of social stratification though no one theory seems to have provided comprehensive coverage. Every society exhibits unique factors and believes, but there exists a close relationship between the way these diverse factors influence social stratification. Slavery is still eminent in nations such as Ghana, Benin and Mauritania among others. Also, Asia has been mentioned numerously for prevalent cases in sex slavery. Social stratification is a societal characteristic and not an individual view. The society forms a uniform way of grading persons 'which is not a sole person's objective'. Below are the definitions that Weber gave to his three factors of influence; The Sociological View of Social Stratification and Inequality In his theory of Marxism essays about peer pressure, Karl asserted that social stratification in the society is based on the way people are related to the factors of production. In such best website write essays online, there exist two different categories of persons; those that own the factors of production and those who labor for the owner of the factors of production. The classification by Karl Marx seems to be inadequate especially in the current view of economics. This is because there exist various aspects of the present economy that have been left unsolved by the Marxism theory. For instance; it does not provide accurate categorization as to productive, occupational and economic aspects of society. Various dimensions of stratification are closely related to one another, but this does not mean that they are not exclusively autonomous. For instance, such dimensions as power, prestige, income and education are in a way related to one another. However, in some cases best sites to buy essays, it can be noted that power is independent of the other factors. In fact, in certain circumstances, power may be attained irrespective of occupational prestige. Again, a certain level of education grounds may not be strong enough if not accompanied by money. The key role of a multidimensional model is to address issues of interdependence and independence of social stratification factors. Origins of the Social Stratification Theory
0 Kommentarer
Lämna ett svar. |