1499 words 1366 words 1036 words
1356 words
2028 words
625 words 974 words 587 words
1826 words
1763 words
1926 words
1382 words
2332 words
851 words
984 words
789 words 539 words 1916 words 914 words
1349 words 1428 words
1355 words 1828 words 1253 words 868 words 2028 words
877 words The agencies are surprisingly thorough in hiring writers, which surprised me. I had to provide evidence of my qualifications as well as samples of my writing. I was asked to provide a breakdown of the areas in which I felt comfortable writing (but that has never stopped me taking on essays in areas that are not immediately familiar). It was also a prerequisite that I had graduated from Oxbridge or another Russell Group university. We are told that we are the best, the pick of the crop. I don’t justify the work I’m doing on ethical grounds. While what I do is not illegal, it does enable others to break rules and suffer the consequences if they are caught. The agencies maintain the image of legitimate businesses: many do not even refer to “cheating”. You are simply “helping” with an assignment (making up, as one agency argues, for the university’s failure to provide adequate tuition). While I’m happy to acknowledge that I am dependent on clients’ continued cheating, this doesn’t mean I am not conscious that my job is a symptom of an illness, a fracture, in our universities. #14 Submitted by Anonymouse on December 18, 2016 - 8:48pm #12 Submitted by jhmh29jh on March 25, 2017 - 4:05am I know all the tricks universities use to identify plagiarism and have learned how to dodge them. Now that software can identify the percentage of text that has been lifted from other sources, bespoke personalised essays – as opposed to generic ones – are the norm. I’ve also edited students’ clumsy plagiarism, hiding their tracks with my own well-hidden watermarks. #15 Submitted by jhmh29jh on March 25, 2017 - 4:03am Very sadly, a year on things haven't really changed for me and, in some ways, are worse (if that's possible). I am spending my life looking for work and I have tried. My impression is I'll really struggle to get work in H.E. and struggle to get work outside of it (viewed as overqualified). So now I must do what is best for me. I can make up to £150 for a standard essay of 2,000-3,000 words – an evening’s work. Longer items can fetch up to £2,000. I've hit rock bottom and can't see a way through unemployment. I am trying very hard to get a job (I'm not limiting myself to academia) but although I've many skills and good experience funding across many areas has been cut. It's been tactfully suggested that I leave out some of the qualifications on my CV (by someone who works for the same department that funded my PhD) but my qualifications have been published and the idea of doing this doesn't rest well with me. I am under extreme pressure to get a job, my back is against the wall and if it is the students who can put work my way, help me pay the bills and relieve pressure then I may need to travel this path but it will be with a heavy heart and great reluctance. At one time I'd have been horrified at the idea but I now understand why people need to do it and needs must. Many people are critical of Essay Mills but as the author says: "I operate on the assumption that the student I’m working for will have little or no personal interaction with academic staff", despite paying higher tuition fees than ever, students are still not getting the support that they need from the UK university system. Google Books and Wikipedia are the tools of my trade. I give the illusion of depth, the impression of analysis. It’s always enough to score a 2:1 (at least) Absolutely not, anonymous. Don't even think twice about feeling bad. If your writing skills are good (and they seem to be) there is nothing stopping you from making between $200 - $400 a day (yes, even that much) doing what you're naturally good at. #6 Submitted by marderiv on July 27, 2015 - 1:35pm #11 Submitted by John ibn Oxbridge on December 12, 2016 - 7:29pm The deadlines of the assignments are so strict that you do not have the time to learn things. The content has to be compiled and submitted before the submission date. When you do not have a professional grip of the subject, you cannot expect this to happen in most cases. A lot of students make a schedule to complete their paper but fail to implement it properly. Apart from that, the corrections in the assignment slow down the completion process. For instance, if your advisor tells you to correct some points, you would have to leave all the remaining chapters and rectify the mistakes. It is obvious that this would consume time as well. Apart from that, most students cannot manage the requirements of the time. They have to work on their daily academic tasks, prepare for examinations and make projects. This does not leave quality time for academic writing. Hence, students get professional help so that they do not have to spend time on academic writing and risk their other achievements. Using citation styles can be very hard when you do not know anything about them. An academic assignment cannot be submitted to the supervisor until it has been written according to the desired citation format. Do you know that citation style covers various dimensions of the assignment? One of them is the layout of the paper. The boundaries and margins of paper need to be constructed properly and the text size has to be selected properly. The judgment committee awards scores for every aspect of the assignment. Thus, if your paper lacks anything, your grade would go down by some margin. Do not stress yourself with academic writing pressures when we can deliver the best for you Everything which is written needs to be checked and this is what most students do not know about. They think that an academic assignment does not need to be checked and it can be submitted without editing when the word count has been completed. This is not how things work. You need to go through each chapter, section and portion to remove errors. Apart from the content areas, the layout design also has to be checked. This includes the table of contents and the title page. Once you have checked everything and all the mistakes have been removed essay style paper examples, you can submit the paper. Notre Dame. IN 46556 The volume's editor, Louis J. Matz, argues convincingly in his invaluable introduction that the posthumous essays are at least consistent with views in Mill's published and unpublished writings. The best known of those views is Mill's observation that he did not need theistic beliefs, since he was brought up imbued with the importance of morality. Mill lived in an era when rapidly developing scientific explanations for natural phenomena were increasingly challenging traditional religious explanations. Matz suspects Mill judged that religion might still be useful for promoting morality, even if the intellectual underpinnings of theism were increasingly implausible, a dilemma shared in heightened relief today, given the advancement of scientific explanation. This splendid volume brings together three intriguing essays on religion by John Stuart Mill, "Nature", "Utility of Religion", and "Theism". First published by his stepdaughter Helen Taylor in 1874, the year after his death, they will be as surprising to many readers as they reportedly were to his contemporaries. His earlier works had led many to conclude that he was dismissive of religion, while the essays here confound those presumptions. Mill finds the argument from design far more significant, in part because it lends itself to testing by the scientific method he holds paramount (p. 161). Surprisingly perhaps, given his rejection of so many other claimed proofs of the existence of god, he admits that "the adaptations in Nature afford a large balance of probability in favour of creation of intelligence" (p. 166). Lest any contemporary proponents of Intelligent Design rush to cite Mill for support, however, note that he qualifies this conclusion by pointing to the limits of "the present state of our knowledge". In other words, although he was familiar with Darwin's The Origin of Species (1859), Mill acknowledged that, in the mid-nineteenth century, we did not yet know enough about the natural world to account for all the then-current conditions of the species. Concluding that he could not rule out the argument from design is a far cry from concluding that it proved the existence of a deity. Further, his critics at the time thought he had not sufficiently understood the power of Darwin's work (p. 49). In "Theism", Mill considers a range of arguments for the existence of God, using a methodology consistent with his lifelong insistence on evidence. He believes it to be "indispensable" that
0 Kommentarer
Lämna ett svar. |